Skip Navigation

No visible optical variability from a relativistic blast wave encountering a wind termination shock

  1. R. Keppens2,3,4
  1. 1Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, PO box 94248, 1090 SJ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  2. 2Centre for Plasma Astrophysics, K.U. Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200B, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
  3. 3FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
  4. 4Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
  1. E-mail: H.J.vanEerten{at}uva.nl
  • In original form 2009 April 20.
  • Received 2009 June 19.
  • Accepted 2009 June 30.
  • First published online September 1, 2009.

Abstract

Gamma-ray burst afterglow flares and rebrightenings of the optical and X-ray light curves have been attributed to both late-time inner engine activity and density changes in the medium surrounding the burster. To test the latter, we study the encounter between the relativistic blast wave from a gamma-ray burster and a stellar wind termination shock. The blast wave is simulated using a high-performance adaptive mesh relativistic hydrodynamic code, amrvac, and the synchrotron emission is analysed in detail with a separate radiation code. We find no bump in the resulting light curve, not even for very high density jumps. Furthermore, by analysing the contributions from the different shock wave regions we are able to establish that it is essential to resolve the blast wave structure in order to make qualitatively correct predictions on the observed output and that the contribution from the reverse shock region will not stand out, even when the magnetic field is increased in this region by repeated shocks. This study resolves a controversy in the recent literature.

Keywords

Key words

| Table of Contents

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.